Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7

Price, context and benchmark scores side by side — every number from the live model catalogue.

Claude Fable 5anthropic Claude Opus 4.7anthropic
Input / 1M tokens $10.00 $5.00
Output / 1M tokens $50.00 $25.00
1M in + 300K out $25.00 $12.50
Context window 1M 1M
Intelligence index 59.9 53.5
Coding index 76.5 73.6
Agentic index 52.8 44.4
Cheapest provider Azure Anthropic
Providers serving it 4 4
Weights Closed Closed
Image input Yes Yes
Tool calling Yes Yes
Reasoning mode Yes Yes
Released Jun 9, 2026 Apr 16, 2026

Which one to pick

Pick Claude Fable 5 if…

  • You want the higher general-intelligence score (59.9).
  • Code quality is the priority — it leads on the coding index (76.5).
  • You are running agent loops — higher agentic index (52.8).

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 if…

  • Token cost matters: $25.00 per 1M output vs $50.00.
  • You need the bigger context window (1M).

FAQ

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Claude Opus 4.7?

Claude Fable 5 scores higher on general intelligence (59.9 vs 53.5), while Claude Opus 4.7 is 2.0× cheaper per output token ($25.00 vs $50.00). For code, Claude Fable 5 leads (76.5 coding index). Claude Opus 4.7 takes the larger context at 1M.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.7?

Claude Opus 4.7, at $25.00 per 1M output tokens versus $50.00. On a 1M input + 300K output workload that is $12.50 against $25.00.

Can I self-host Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.7?

Claude Fable 5: closed weights, API only. Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights, API only.

Related comparisons