Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

Price, context and benchmark scores side by side — every number from the live model catalogue.

Claude Fable 5anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6anthropic
Input / 1M tokens $10.00 $3.00
Output / 1M tokens $50.00 $15.00
1M in + 300K out $25.00 $7.50
Context window 1M 1M
Intelligence index 59.9 47.2
Coding index 76.5 63.0
Agentic index 52.8 40.8
Cheapest provider Azure Azure
Providers serving it 4 4
Weights Closed Closed
Image input Yes Yes
Tool calling Yes Yes
Reasoning mode Yes Yes
Released Jun 9, 2026 Feb 17, 2026

Which one to pick

Pick Claude Fable 5 if…

  • You want the higher general-intelligence score (59.9).
  • Code quality is the priority — it leads on the coding index (76.5).
  • You are running agent loops — higher agentic index (52.8).

Pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 if…

  • Token cost matters: $15.00 per 1M output vs $50.00.
  • You need the bigger context window (1M).

FAQ

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Claude Sonnet 4.6?

Claude Fable 5 scores higher on general intelligence (59.9 vs 47.2), while Claude Sonnet 4.6 is 3.3× cheaper per output token ($15.00 vs $50.00). For code, Claude Fable 5 leads (76.5 coding index). Claude Sonnet 4.6 takes the larger context at 1M.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?

Claude Sonnet 4.6, at $15.00 per 1M output tokens versus $50.00. On a 1M input + 300K output workload that is $7.50 against $25.00.

Can I self-host Claude Fable 5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?

Claude Fable 5: closed weights, API only. Claude Sonnet 4.6: closed weights, API only.

Related comparisons