Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

Price, context and benchmark scores side by side — every number from the live model catalogue.

Claude Fable 5anthropic DeepSeek V4 Prodeepseek
Input / 1M tokens $10.00 $0.435
Output / 1M tokens $50.00 $0.870
1M in + 300K out $25.00 $0.70
Context window 1M 1.0M
Intelligence index 59.9 44.3
Coding index 76.5 59.4
Agentic index 52.8 36.4
Cheapest provider Azure DeepSeek
Providers serving it 4 18
Weights Closed Open
Image input Yes No
Tool calling Yes Yes
Reasoning mode Yes Yes
Released Jun 9, 2026 Apr 24, 2026

Which one to pick

Pick Claude Fable 5 if…

  • You want the higher general-intelligence score (59.9).
  • Code quality is the priority — it leads on the coding index (76.5).
  • You are running agent loops — higher agentic index (52.8).

Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro if…

  • Token cost matters: $0.870 per 1M output vs $50.00.
  • You need the bigger context window (1.0M).
  • You want the option to self-host — weights are public.
  • You want provider redundancy: 18 providers serve it.

FAQ

Is Claude Fable 5 better than DeepSeek V4 Pro?

Claude Fable 5 scores higher on general intelligence (59.9 vs 44.3), while DeepSeek V4 Pro is 57× cheaper per output token ($0.870 vs $50.00). For code, Claude Fable 5 leads (76.5 coding index). DeepSeek V4 Pro takes the larger context at 1.0M.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?

DeepSeek V4 Pro, at $0.870 per 1M output tokens versus $50.00. On a 1M input + 300K output workload that is $0.70 against $25.00.

Can I self-host Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?

Claude Fable 5: closed weights, API only. DeepSeek V4 Pro: open weights (deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro).

Related comparisons