Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Price, context and benchmark scores side by side — every number from the live model catalogue.

Claude Fable 5anthropic Gemini 3.5 Flashgoogle
Input / 1M tokens $10.00 $1.50
Output / 1M tokens $50.00 $9.00
1M in + 300K out $25.00 $4.20
Context window 1M 1.0M
Intelligence index 59.9 50.2
Coding index 76.5 70.1
Agentic index 52.8 37.4
Cheapest provider Azure Google
Providers serving it 4 2
Weights Closed Closed
Image input Yes Yes
Tool calling Yes Yes
Reasoning mode Yes Yes
Released Jun 9, 2026 May 19, 2026

Which one to pick

Pick Claude Fable 5 if…

  • You want the higher general-intelligence score (59.9).
  • Code quality is the priority — it leads on the coding index (76.5).
  • You are running agent loops — higher agentic index (52.8).
  • You want provider redundancy: 4 providers serve it.

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash if…

  • Token cost matters: $9.00 per 1M output vs $50.00.
  • You need the bigger context window (1.0M).

FAQ

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Claude Fable 5 scores higher on general intelligence (59.9 vs 50.2), while Gemini 3.5 Flash is 5.6× cheaper per output token ($9.00 vs $50.00). For code, Claude Fable 5 leads (76.5 coding index). Gemini 3.5 Flash takes the larger context at 1.0M.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash, at $9.00 per 1M output tokens versus $50.00. On a 1M input + 300K output workload that is $4.20 against $25.00.

Can I self-host Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Claude Fable 5: closed weights, API only. Gemini 3.5 Flash: closed weights, API only.

Related comparisons