Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Price, context and benchmark scores side by side — every number from the live model catalogue.

Claude Fable 5anthropic GPT-5.6 Terraopenai
Input / 1M tokens $10.00 $1.25
Output / 1M tokens $50.00 $7.50
1M in + 300K out $25.00 $3.50
Context window 1M 1.1M
Intelligence index 59.9 55.0
Coding index 76.5 76.7
Agentic index 52.8 47.4
Cheapest provider Azure OpenAI
Providers serving it 4 2
Weights Closed Closed
Image input Yes Yes
Tool calling Yes Yes
Reasoning mode Yes Yes
Released Jun 9, 2026 Jul 9, 2026

Which one to pick

Pick Claude Fable 5 if…

  • You want the higher general-intelligence score (59.9).
  • You are running agent loops — higher agentic index (52.8).
  • You want provider redundancy: 4 providers serve it.

Pick GPT-5.6 Terra if…

  • Code quality is the priority — it leads on the coding index (76.7).
  • Token cost matters: $7.50 per 1M output vs $50.00.
  • You need the bigger context window (1.1M).

FAQ

Is Claude Fable 5 better than GPT-5.6 Terra?

Claude Fable 5 scores higher on general intelligence (59.9 vs 55.0), while GPT-5.6 Terra is 6.7× cheaper per output token ($7.50 vs $50.00). For code, GPT-5.6 Terra leads (76.7 coding index). GPT-5.6 Terra takes the larger context at 1.1M.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.6 Terra?

GPT-5.6 Terra, at $7.50 per 1M output tokens versus $50.00. On a 1M input + 300K output workload that is $3.50 against $25.00.

Can I self-host Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.6 Terra?

Claude Fable 5: closed weights, API only. GPT-5.6 Terra: closed weights, API only.

Related comparisons