Claude Fable 5 vs MiniMax M3

Price, context and benchmark scores side by side — every number from the live model catalogue.

Claude Fable 5anthropic MiniMax M3minimax
Input / 1M tokens $10.00 $0.240
Output / 1M tokens $50.00 $0.960
1M in + 300K out $25.00 $0.53
Context window 1M 1.0M
Intelligence index 59.9 44.4
Coding index 76.5 58.6
Agentic index 52.8 35.4
Cheapest provider Azure GMICloud
Providers serving it 4 8
Weights Closed Open
Image input Yes Yes
Tool calling Yes Yes
Reasoning mode Yes Yes
Released Jun 9, 2026 May 31, 2026

Which one to pick

Pick Claude Fable 5 if…

  • You want the higher general-intelligence score (59.9).
  • Code quality is the priority — it leads on the coding index (76.5).
  • You are running agent loops — higher agentic index (52.8).

Pick MiniMax M3 if…

  • Token cost matters: $0.960 per 1M output vs $50.00.
  • You need the bigger context window (1.0M).
  • You want the option to self-host — weights are public.
  • You want provider redundancy: 8 providers serve it.

FAQ

Is Claude Fable 5 better than MiniMax M3?

Claude Fable 5 scores higher on general intelligence (59.9 vs 44.4), while MiniMax M3 is 52× cheaper per output token ($0.960 vs $50.00). For code, Claude Fable 5 leads (76.5 coding index). MiniMax M3 takes the larger context at 1.0M.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or MiniMax M3?

MiniMax M3, at $0.960 per 1M output tokens versus $50.00. On a 1M input + 300K output workload that is $0.53 against $25.00.

Can I self-host Claude Fable 5 or MiniMax M3?

Claude Fable 5: closed weights, API only. MiniMax M3: open weights (MiniMaxAI/Minimax-M3).

Related comparisons