Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1

Price, context and benchmark scores side by side — every number from the live model catalogue.

Claude Fable 5anthropic Muse Spark 1.1meta
Input / 1M tokens $10.00 $1.25
Output / 1M tokens $50.00 $4.25
1M in + 300K out $25.00 $2.52
Context window 1M 1.0M
Intelligence index 59.9 50.6
Coding index 76.5 71.3
Agentic index 52.8 37.5
Cheapest provider Azure Meta
Providers serving it 4 1
Weights Closed Closed
Image input Yes Yes
Tool calling Yes Yes
Reasoning mode Yes Yes
Released Jun 9, 2026 Jul 16, 2026

Which one to pick

Pick Claude Fable 5 if…

  • You want the higher general-intelligence score (59.9).
  • Code quality is the priority — it leads on the coding index (76.5).
  • You are running agent loops — higher agentic index (52.8).
  • You want provider redundancy: 4 providers serve it.

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 if…

  • Token cost matters: $4.25 per 1M output vs $50.00.
  • You need the bigger context window (1.0M).

FAQ

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Claude Fable 5 scores higher on general intelligence (59.9 vs 50.6), while Muse Spark 1.1 is 12× cheaper per output token ($4.25 vs $50.00). For code, Claude Fable 5 leads (76.5 coding index). Muse Spark 1.1 takes the larger context at 1.0M.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1, at $4.25 per 1M output tokens versus $50.00. On a 1M input + 300K output workload that is $2.52 against $25.00.

Can I self-host Claude Fable 5 or Muse Spark 1.1?

Claude Fable 5: closed weights, API only. Muse Spark 1.1: closed weights, API only.

Related comparisons