Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kimi K3
Price, context and benchmark scores side by side — every number from the live model catalogue.
| Claude Opus 4.8anthropic | Kimi K3moonshotai | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $5.00 | $3.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $25.00 | $15.00 |
| 1M in + 300K out | $12.50 | $7.50 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| Intelligence index | 55.7 | 57.1 |
| Coding index | 74.3 | 76.2 |
| Agentic index | 47.2 | 50.1 |
| Cheapest provider | Azure | BaseTen |
| Providers serving it | 4 | 6 |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Image input | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning mode | Yes | Yes |
| Released | May 27, 2026 | Jul 16, 2026 |
Which one to pick
Pick Claude Opus 4.8 if…
Pick Kimi K3 if…
- You want the higher general-intelligence score (57.1).
- Code quality is the priority — it leads on the coding index (76.2).
- You are running agent loops — higher agentic index (50.1).
- Token cost matters: $15.00 per 1M output vs $25.00.
- You need the bigger context window (1.0M).
- You want the option to self-host — weights are public.
- You want provider redundancy: 6 providers serve it.
FAQ
Is Claude Opus 4.8 better than Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 scores higher on general intelligence (55.7 vs 57.1), while Kimi K3 is 1.7× cheaper per output token ($15.00 vs $25.00). For code, Kimi K3 leads (76.2 coding index). Kimi K3 takes the larger context at 1.0M.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Kimi K3?
Kimi K3, at $15.00 per 1M output tokens versus $25.00. On a 1M input + 300K output workload that is $7.50 against $12.50.
Can I self-host Claude Opus 4.8 or Kimi K3?
Claude Opus 4.8: closed weights, API only. Kimi K3: open weights (moonshotai/Kimi-K3).