Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Price, context and benchmark scores side by side — every number from the live model catalogue.

Claude Opus 5anthropic GPT-5.6 Lunaopenai
Input / 1M tokens $5.00 $0.500
Output / 1M tokens $25.00 $3.00
1M in + 300K out $12.50 $1.40
Context window 1M 1.1M
Intelligence index 60.7 51.2
Coding index 78.0 71.4
Agentic index 55.3 45.6
Cheapest provider Claude Platform on AWS OpenAI
Providers serving it 5 2
Weights Closed Closed
Image input Yes Yes
Tool calling Yes Yes
Reasoning mode Yes Yes
Released Jul 24, 2026 Jul 9, 2026

Which one to pick

Pick Claude Opus 5 if…

  • You want the higher general-intelligence score (60.7).
  • Code quality is the priority — it leads on the coding index (78.0).
  • You are running agent loops — higher agentic index (55.3).
  • You want provider redundancy: 5 providers serve it.

Pick GPT-5.6 Luna if…

  • Token cost matters: $3.00 per 1M output vs $25.00.
  • You need the bigger context window (1.1M).

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 5 better than GPT-5.6 Luna?

Claude Opus 5 scores higher on general intelligence (60.7 vs 51.2), while GPT-5.6 Luna is 8.3× cheaper per output token ($3.00 vs $25.00). For code, Claude Opus 5 leads (78.0 coding index). GPT-5.6 Luna takes the larger context at 1.1M.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or GPT-5.6 Luna?

GPT-5.6 Luna, at $3.00 per 1M output tokens versus $25.00. On a 1M input + 300K output workload that is $1.40 against $12.50.

Can I self-host Claude Opus 5 or GPT-5.6 Luna?

Claude Opus 5: closed weights, API only. GPT-5.6 Luna: closed weights, API only.

Related comparisons