Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7 Max
Price, context and benchmark scores side by side — every number from the live model catalogue.
| Claude Opus 5anthropic | Qwen3.7 Maxqwen | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $5.00 | $1.48 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $25.00 | $4.42 |
| 1M in + 300K out | $12.50 | $2.80 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Intelligence index | 60.7 | 46.0 |
| Coding index | 78.0 | 66.0 |
| Agentic index | 55.3 | 30.6 |
| Cheapest provider | Claude Platform on AWS | Alibaba |
| Providers serving it | 5 | 1 |
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Image input | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning mode | Yes | Yes |
| Released | Jul 24, 2026 | May 21, 2026 |
Which one to pick
Pick Claude Opus 5 if…
- You want the higher general-intelligence score (60.7).
- Code quality is the priority — it leads on the coding index (78.0).
- You are running agent loops — higher agentic index (55.3).
- You want provider redundancy: 5 providers serve it.
Pick Qwen3.7 Max if…
- Token cost matters: $4.42 per 1M output vs $25.00.
- You need the bigger context window (1M).
FAQ
Is Claude Opus 5 better than Qwen3.7 Max?
Claude Opus 5 scores higher on general intelligence (60.7 vs 46.0), while Qwen3.7 Max is 5.6× cheaper per output token ($4.42 vs $25.00). For code, Claude Opus 5 leads (78.0 coding index). Qwen3.7 Max takes the larger context at 1M.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max, at $4.42 per 1M output tokens versus $25.00. On a 1M input + 300K output workload that is $2.80 against $12.50.
Can I self-host Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3.7 Max?
Claude Opus 5: closed weights, API only. Qwen3.7 Max: closed weights, API only.