Grok 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Price, context and benchmark scores side by side — every number from the live model catalogue.

Grok 4.5x-ai MiMo-V2.5-Proxiaomi
Input / 1M tokens $2.00 $0.348
Output / 1M tokens $6.00 $0.696
1M in + 300K out $3.80 $0.56
Context window 500K 1.1M
Intelligence index 53.8 42.2
Coding index 72.4 60.2
Agentic index 45.7 29.1
Cheapest provider xAI GMICloud
Providers serving it 1 6
Weights Closed Open
Image input Yes No
Tool calling Yes Yes
Reasoning mode Yes Yes
Released Jul 8, 2026 Apr 22, 2026

Which one to pick

Pick Grok 4.5 if…

  • You want the higher general-intelligence score (53.8).
  • Code quality is the priority — it leads on the coding index (72.4).
  • You are running agent loops — higher agentic index (45.7).

Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if…

  • Token cost matters: $0.696 per 1M output vs $6.00.
  • You need the bigger context window (1.1M).
  • You want the option to self-host — weights are public.
  • You want provider redundancy: 6 providers serve it.

FAQ

Is Grok 4.5 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Grok 4.5 scores higher on general intelligence (53.8 vs 42.2), while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 8.6× cheaper per output token ($0.696 vs $6.00). For code, Grok 4.5 leads (72.4 coding index). MiMo-V2.5-Pro takes the larger context at 1.1M.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.5 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro, at $0.696 per 1M output tokens versus $6.00. On a 1M input + 300K output workload that is $0.56 against $3.80.

Can I self-host Grok 4.5 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Grok 4.5: closed weights, API only. MiMo-V2.5-Pro: open weights (XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.5-Pro).

Related comparisons