Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Price, context and benchmark scores side by side — every number from the live model catalogue.
| Claude Fable 5anthropic | Kimi K2.7 Codemoonshotai | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $10.00 | $0.710 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $50.00 | $3.50 |
| 1M in + 300K out | $25.00 | $1.76 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Intelligence index | 59.9 | 41.9 |
| Coding index | 76.5 | 60.8 |
| Agentic index | 52.8 | 29.6 |
| Cheapest provider | Azure | CoreWeave |
| Providers serving it | 4 | 13 |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Image input | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning mode | Yes | Yes |
| Released | Jun 9, 2026 | Jun 12, 2026 |
Which one to pick
Pick Claude Fable 5 if…
- You want the higher general-intelligence score (59.9).
- Code quality is the priority — it leads on the coding index (76.5).
- You are running agent loops — higher agentic index (52.8).
- You need the bigger context window (1M).
Pick Kimi K2.7 Code if…
- Token cost matters: $3.50 per 1M output vs $50.00.
- You want the option to self-host — weights are public.
- You want provider redundancy: 13 providers serve it.
FAQ
Is Claude Fable 5 better than Kimi K2.7 Code?
Claude Fable 5 scores higher on general intelligence (59.9 vs 41.9), while Kimi K2.7 Code is 14× cheaper per output token ($3.50 vs $50.00). For code, Claude Fable 5 leads (76.5 coding index). Claude Fable 5 takes the larger context at 1M.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Kimi K2.7 Code?
Kimi K2.7 Code, at $3.50 per 1M output tokens versus $50.00. On a 1M input + 300K output workload that is $1.76 against $25.00.
Can I self-host Claude Fable 5 or Kimi K2.7 Code?
Claude Fable 5: closed weights, API only. Kimi K2.7 Code: open weights (moonshotai/Kimi-K2.7-Code).