Claude Opus 4.7 vs Grok 4.5

Price, context and benchmark scores side by side — every number from the live model catalogue.

Claude Opus 4.7anthropic Grok 4.5x-ai
Input / 1M tokens $5.00 $2.00
Output / 1M tokens $25.00 $6.00
1M in + 300K out $12.50 $3.80
Context window 1M 500K
Intelligence index 53.5 53.8
Coding index 73.6 72.4
Agentic index 44.4 45.7
Cheapest provider Anthropic xAI
Providers serving it 4 1
Weights Closed Closed
Image input Yes Yes
Tool calling Yes Yes
Reasoning mode Yes Yes
Released Apr 16, 2026 Jul 8, 2026

Which one to pick

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 if…

  • Code quality is the priority — it leads on the coding index (73.6).
  • You need the bigger context window (1M).
  • You want provider redundancy: 4 providers serve it.

Pick Grok 4.5 if…

  • You want the higher general-intelligence score (53.8).
  • You are running agent loops — higher agentic index (45.7).
  • Token cost matters: $6.00 per 1M output vs $25.00.

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Grok 4.5?

Grok 4.5 scores higher on general intelligence (53.5 vs 53.8), while Grok 4.5 is 4.2× cheaper per output token ($6.00 vs $25.00). For code, Claude Opus 4.7 leads (73.6 coding index). Claude Opus 4.7 takes the larger context at 1M.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Grok 4.5?

Grok 4.5, at $6.00 per 1M output tokens versus $25.00. On a 1M input + 300K output workload that is $3.80 against $12.50.

Can I self-host Claude Opus 4.7 or Grok 4.5?

Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights, API only. Grok 4.5: closed weights, API only.

Related comparisons