Claude Opus 4.8 vs Hy3 preview

Price, context and benchmark scores side by side — every number from the live model catalogue.

Claude Opus 4.8anthropic Hy3 previewtencent
Input / 1M tokens $5.00 $0.063
Output / 1M tokens $25.00 $0.210
1M in + 300K out $12.50 $0.13
Context window 1M 262K
Intelligence index 55.7 41.2
Coding index 74.3 58.8
Agentic index 47.2 30.7
Cheapest provider Azure GMICloud
Providers serving it 4 1
Weights Closed Open
Image input Yes No
Tool calling Yes Yes
Reasoning mode Yes Yes
Released May 27, 2026 Apr 22, 2026

Which one to pick

Pick Claude Opus 4.8 if…

  • You want the higher general-intelligence score (55.7).
  • Code quality is the priority — it leads on the coding index (74.3).
  • You are running agent loops — higher agentic index (47.2).
  • You need the bigger context window (1M).
  • You want provider redundancy: 4 providers serve it.

Pick Hy3 preview if…

  • Token cost matters: $0.210 per 1M output vs $25.00.
  • You want the option to self-host — weights are public.

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.8 better than Hy3 preview?

Claude Opus 4.8 scores higher on general intelligence (55.7 vs 41.2), while Hy3 preview is 119× cheaper per output token ($0.210 vs $25.00). For code, Claude Opus 4.8 leads (74.3 coding index). Claude Opus 4.8 takes the larger context at 1M.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Hy3 preview?

Hy3 preview, at $0.210 per 1M output tokens versus $25.00. On a 1M input + 300K output workload that is $0.13 against $12.50.

Can I self-host Claude Opus 4.8 or Hy3 preview?

Claude Opus 4.8: closed weights, API only. Hy3 preview: open weights (tencent/Hy3-preview).

Related comparisons