GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Price, context and benchmark scores side by side — every number from the live model catalogue.

GLM 5.2z-ai GPT-5.6 Terraopenai
Input / 1M tokens $0.741 $1.25
Output / 1M tokens $2.33 $7.50
1M in + 300K out $1.44 $3.50
Context window 1.0M 1.1M
Intelligence index 51.1 55.0
Coding index 68.8 76.7
Agentic index 43.1 47.4
Cheapest provider StreamLake OpenAI
Providers serving it 29 2
Weights Open Closed
Image input No Yes
Tool calling Yes Yes
Reasoning mode Yes Yes
Released Jun 16, 2026 Jul 9, 2026

Which one to pick

Pick GLM 5.2 if…

  • Token cost matters: $2.33 per 1M output vs $7.50.
  • You want the option to self-host — weights are public.
  • You want provider redundancy: 29 providers serve it.

Pick GPT-5.6 Terra if…

  • You want the higher general-intelligence score (55.0).
  • Code quality is the priority — it leads on the coding index (76.7).
  • You are running agent loops — higher agentic index (47.4).
  • You need the bigger context window (1.1M).

FAQ

Is GLM 5.2 better than GPT-5.6 Terra?

GPT-5.6 Terra scores higher on general intelligence (51.1 vs 55.0), while GLM 5.2 is 3.2× cheaper per output token ($2.33 vs $7.50). For code, GPT-5.6 Terra leads (76.7 coding index). GPT-5.6 Terra takes the larger context at 1.1M.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.2 or GPT-5.6 Terra?

GLM 5.2, at $2.33 per 1M output tokens versus $7.50. On a 1M input + 300K output workload that is $1.44 against $3.50.

Can I self-host GLM 5.2 or GPT-5.6 Terra?

GLM 5.2: open weights (zai-org/GLM-5.2). GPT-5.6 Terra: closed weights, API only.

Related comparisons