Kimi K2.6 vs Kimi K3

Price, context and benchmark scores side by side — every number from the live model catalogue.

Kimi K2.6moonshotai Kimi K3moonshotai
Input / 1M tokens $0.600 $3.00
Output / 1M tokens $2.72 $15.00
1M in + 300K out $1.42 $7.50
Context window 262K 1.0M
Intelligence index 44.2 57.1
Coding index 61.8 76.2
Agentic index 30.3 50.1
Cheapest provider Baidu BaseTen
Providers serving it 21 6
Weights Open Open
Image input Yes Yes
Tool calling Yes Yes
Reasoning mode Yes Yes
Released Apr 20, 2026 Jul 16, 2026

Which one to pick

Pick Kimi K2.6 if…

  • Token cost matters: $2.72 per 1M output vs $15.00.
  • You want provider redundancy: 21 providers serve it.

Pick Kimi K3 if…

  • You want the higher general-intelligence score (57.1).
  • Code quality is the priority — it leads on the coding index (76.2).
  • You are running agent loops — higher agentic index (50.1).
  • You need the bigger context window (1.0M).

FAQ

Is Kimi K2.6 better than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 scores higher on general intelligence (44.2 vs 57.1), while Kimi K2.6 is 5.5× cheaper per output token ($2.72 vs $15.00). For code, Kimi K3 leads (76.2 coding index). Kimi K3 takes the larger context at 1.0M.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or Kimi K3?

Kimi K2.6, at $2.72 per 1M output tokens versus $15.00. On a 1M input + 300K output workload that is $1.42 against $7.50.

Can I self-host Kimi K2.6 or Kimi K3?

Kimi K2.6: open weights (moonshotai/Kimi-K2.6). Kimi K3: open weights (moonshotai/Kimi-K3).

Related comparisons