Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Price, context and benchmark scores side by side — every number from the live model catalogue.

Claude Opus 4.7anthropic GPT-5.6 Terraopenai
Input / 1M tokens $5.00 $1.25
Output / 1M tokens $25.00 $7.50
1M in + 300K out $12.50 $3.50
Context window 1M 1.1M
Intelligence index 53.5 55.0
Coding index 73.6 76.7
Agentic index 44.4 47.4
Cheapest provider Anthropic OpenAI
Providers serving it 4 2
Weights Closed Closed
Image input Yes Yes
Tool calling Yes Yes
Reasoning mode Yes Yes
Released Apr 16, 2026 Jul 9, 2026

Which one to pick

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 if…

  • You want provider redundancy: 4 providers serve it.

Pick GPT-5.6 Terra if…

  • You want the higher general-intelligence score (55.0).
  • Code quality is the priority — it leads on the coding index (76.7).
  • You are running agent loops — higher agentic index (47.4).
  • Token cost matters: $7.50 per 1M output vs $25.00.
  • You need the bigger context window (1.1M).

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than GPT-5.6 Terra?

GPT-5.6 Terra scores higher on general intelligence (53.5 vs 55.0), while GPT-5.6 Terra is 3.3× cheaper per output token ($7.50 vs $25.00). For code, GPT-5.6 Terra leads (76.7 coding index). GPT-5.6 Terra takes the larger context at 1.1M.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.6 Terra?

GPT-5.6 Terra, at $7.50 per 1M output tokens versus $25.00. On a 1M input + 300K output workload that is $3.50 against $12.50.

Can I self-host Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.6 Terra?

Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights, API only. GPT-5.6 Terra: closed weights, API only.

Related comparisons