Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Price, context and benchmark scores side by side — every number from the live model catalogue.
| Claude Opus 4.8anthropic | Kimi K2.7 Codemoonshotai | |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $5.00 | $0.710 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $25.00 | $3.50 |
| 1M in + 300K out | $12.50 | $1.76 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Intelligence index | 55.7 | 41.9 |
| Coding index | 74.3 | 60.8 |
| Agentic index | 47.2 | 29.6 |
| Cheapest provider | Azure | CoreWeave |
| Providers serving it | 4 | 13 |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Image input | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning mode | Yes | Yes |
| Released | May 27, 2026 | Jun 12, 2026 |
Which one to pick
Pick Claude Opus 4.8 if…
- You want the higher general-intelligence score (55.7).
- Code quality is the priority — it leads on the coding index (74.3).
- You are running agent loops — higher agentic index (47.2).
- You need the bigger context window (1M).
Pick Kimi K2.7 Code if…
- Token cost matters: $3.50 per 1M output vs $25.00.
- You want the option to self-host — weights are public.
- You want provider redundancy: 13 providers serve it.
FAQ
Is Claude Opus 4.8 better than Kimi K2.7 Code?
Claude Opus 4.8 scores higher on general intelligence (55.7 vs 41.9), while Kimi K2.7 Code is 7.1× cheaper per output token ($3.50 vs $25.00). For code, Claude Opus 4.8 leads (74.3 coding index). Claude Opus 4.8 takes the larger context at 1M.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Kimi K2.7 Code?
Kimi K2.7 Code, at $3.50 per 1M output tokens versus $25.00. On a 1M input + 300K output workload that is $1.76 against $12.50.
Can I self-host Claude Opus 4.8 or Kimi K2.7 Code?
Claude Opus 4.8: closed weights, API only. Kimi K2.7 Code: open weights (moonshotai/Kimi-K2.7-Code).