GPT-5.6 Terra vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Price, context and benchmark scores side by side — every number from the live model catalogue.

GPT-5.6 Terraopenai Kimi K2.7 Codemoonshotai
Input / 1M tokens $1.25 $0.710
Output / 1M tokens $7.50 $3.50
1M in + 300K out $3.50 $1.76
Context window 1.1M 262K
Intelligence index 55.0 41.9
Coding index 76.7 60.8
Agentic index 47.4 29.6
Cheapest provider OpenAI CoreWeave
Providers serving it 2 13
Weights Closed Open
Image input Yes Yes
Tool calling Yes Yes
Reasoning mode Yes Yes
Released Jul 9, 2026 Jun 12, 2026

Which one to pick

Pick GPT-5.6 Terra if…

  • You want the higher general-intelligence score (55.0).
  • Code quality is the priority — it leads on the coding index (76.7).
  • You are running agent loops — higher agentic index (47.4).
  • You need the bigger context window (1.1M).

Pick Kimi K2.7 Code if…

  • Token cost matters: $3.50 per 1M output vs $7.50.
  • You want the option to self-host — weights are public.
  • You want provider redundancy: 13 providers serve it.

FAQ

Is GPT-5.6 Terra better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

GPT-5.6 Terra scores higher on general intelligence (55.0 vs 41.9), while Kimi K2.7 Code is 2.1× cheaper per output token ($3.50 vs $7.50). For code, GPT-5.6 Terra leads (76.7 coding index). GPT-5.6 Terra takes the larger context at 1.1M.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Terra or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code, at $3.50 per 1M output tokens versus $7.50. On a 1M input + 300K output workload that is $1.76 against $3.50.

Can I self-host GPT-5.6 Terra or Kimi K2.7 Code?

GPT-5.6 Terra: closed weights, API only. Kimi K2.7 Code: open weights (moonshotai/Kimi-K2.7-Code).

Related comparisons